Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing all 8 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Radovan Stankovic

    Year
    2007
    Issues
    Sexual Violence against Children Sentencing and Reparations
    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Detention Centers Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Torture Forced to watch Rape Incitement

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/3259
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Radovan Stankovic
    Charges
    Stankovic was charged (on 3 March 2003 as amended on 8 December 2003) with crimes against humanity, including rape (Articles 172(1)(c), (e), (f) and (g) of the Criminal Code of BiH) for having set up a detention centre for (often under aged) women, having incited other soldiers to rape detainees, and having coerced several detainees into forced labor and sexual intercourse.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 14 November 2006, the Court of BiH found Stankovic guilty for crimes against humanity, including enslavement, imprisonment, torture and rape for: (i) Establishing a detention centre (“Karaman’s House”), detaining at least nine female persons and inciting soldiers to rape them; (ii) Compelling detainees to forced labor, inside and outside of the detention center; (iii) Repeatedly raping a detainee, compelling her to forced labor at several locations and having her witness him raping her under aged sister; (iv) Raping a detainee at another detention centre. Stankovic was sentenced to sixteen years’ imprisonment.
    sentencing
    The Appellate Panel increased the sentence from 16 to 20 years' imprisonment. Shortly afterwards, Stankovic escaped from jail. He was recaptured in January 2012. he was then sentenced to another two Year' imprisonment for using force while escaping.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The prosecution appealed against the sentence of 16 years’ imprisonment and the acquittal of one of the charges (forcibly taking a female patient from a hospital in Foca and raping her). Stankovic himself basically contested all the Court’s findings, most notably stating that the witness statements were false and fabricated. On 28 March 2007, the Appellate Panel left intact the entire verdict, though it raised the sentence to 20 years’ imprisonment.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    X-KRZ-05/70

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Dragoljub Prcac (Kvocka et al. "Omarska, Keraterm & Trnopolje Camps")

    Year
    2005
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Forced Nudity Sexual Slavery Forced Prostitution Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Forced to watch Rape Foreseeable Consequence Kunarac Akayesu

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/722/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Dragoljub Prcac
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE) for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp. - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Prcac was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 November 2001 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity Prcac was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime
    sentencing
    Prcac was sentenced to 5 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The conviction was upheld by the Appeals Chamber on 28 February 2005.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-98-30/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Milomir Stakic (“Prijedor”)

    Year
    2006
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Modes of Liability
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Rape Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Detention Centers Forced to watch Rape Genocidal Intent Coercion

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/782/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Milomir Stakic
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (co-perpetration), which included rapes and sexual assault.- Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide or, alternatively, complicity in genocide under Article 7(1) (JCE) and 7(3) (command responsibility), which included subjecting Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Croat detainees in various camps (e.g. Omarska, Keraterm, Trnopolje) and detention facilities in the Prijedor municipality to rape and sexual assault or forcing them to witness such crimes.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Stakic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 31 July 2003 of:- Persecution as a crime against humanity Stakic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of:- Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide or, alternatively, complicity in genocide as it was not proved that Stakic had the specific genocidal intent.
    sentencing
    Stakic was sentenced to 40 years’ imprisonment on 22 March 2006.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber confirmed the conviction, but changed the mode of liability from co-perpetration to JCE I.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-97-24

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Miroslav Kvocka (“Kvocka et al.”)

    Year
    2005
    Issues
    Modes of Liability Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Akayesu Cumulative Conviction Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise Forced to watch Rape Forced Nudity Foreseeable Consequence Mental Harm Persecution on Sexual Grounds Kunarac

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/722/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Miroslav Kvocka (“Kvocka et al.”)
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE) for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp; - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Kvocka was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 November 2001 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity. Kvocka was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp.
    sentencing
    Kvocka was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 7 years’ imprisonment on 28 February 2005 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Although Kvocka was initially found guilty by the Trial Chamber of persecution as a crime against humanity for the sexual violence crimes, this conviction was reversed by the Appeals Chamber on 28 February 2005.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-98-30/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Mlado Radic (Kvocka et al. "Omarska, Keraterm & Trnopolje Camps")

    Year
    2005
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Forced Nudity Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Attempted Rape Threat of Rape Forced to watch Rape Forced Prostitution Akayesu Kunarac

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/722/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Mlado Radic
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE) for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp. - Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE) for the rape of Witness K, the attempted rape of Witness J and the threat of rape or other forms of sexual violence committed against Witness F, Zlata Cikota and Sifeta Sušic in Omarska camp. - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp. - Torture as a crime against humanity, rape as a crime against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for the rape of Witness K, the attempted rape of Witness J and the threat of rape or other forms of sexual violence committed against Witness F, Zlata Cikota and Sifeta Sušic in Omarska camp.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Radic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 November 2001 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity - Torture as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime Radic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime - Torture as a crime against humanity, - Rape as a crime against humanity and - Outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime
    sentencing
    Radic received a sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment on 28 February 2005.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The conviction was upheld by the Appeals Chamber on 28 February 2005.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-98-30/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Simo Zaric (Simic et al. "Bosanski Samac")

    Year
    2003
    Issues
    Modes of Liability Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Forced Oral Sex Forced Nudity Urination Forced to watch Rape Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE)

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/781/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Simo Zaric
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (aiding and abetting), which included sexual assaults of detainees (constituting torture) of non-Serb civilians in the municipality of Bosanski Samac.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Zaric was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 17 October 2003 of:- Persecution as a crime against humanity. Judge Per-Johan Lindholm dissented from the Trial Chamber’s Judgement as to the mode of liability; according to the Judge, Zaric, like co-accused Simic, was liable under JCE I.
    sentencing
    Zaric was sentenced to 6 years’ imprisonment on 17 October 2003 by the Trial Chamber.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Zaric did not appeal the Trial Chamber’s judgment.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-95-9

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Zoran Zigic (“Kvocka et al.”)

    Year
    2005
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Modes of Liability Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    Acquittal Akayesu Cumulative Conviction Extended Joint Criminal Enterprise Foreseeable Consequence Forced Nudity Forced to watch Rape Mental Harm Persecution on Sexual Grounds Kunarac

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/722/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Zoran Zigic (“Kvocka et al.”)
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE) for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp. - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime for sexual assault and rape of Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats and other non-Serbs detained in Omarska camp.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Zigic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 November 2001 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity under Article 7(1) (JCE). Zigic was found not guilty by the Trial Chamber of: - Inhumane acts as crimes against humanity and outrages upon personal dignity as a violation of the laws or customs of war as a war crime.
    sentencing
    Zigic was sentenced by the Appeals Chamber to 25 years’ imprisonment on 28 February 2005 (for other charges).
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Although Zigic was initially found guilty by the Trial Chamber of persecution as a crime against humanity for the sexual violence crimes, this conviction was reversed by the Appeals Chamber on 28 February 2005.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-98-30/1

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    USA Supreme Court - Emmanuel Constant (“Doe v. Constant”)

    Year
    2010
    Issues
    Sentencing and Reparations
    Country
    United States of America
    Keywords
    Forced to watch Rape Forced Rape of Family Members Gang Rape Terrorism

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/1116
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    US Supreme Court
    Name of accused
    Emmanuel Constant
    Charges
    Torture, crimes against humanity and the systematic use of violence against women (including rape in 2006) under the Alien Tort Statute and the Torture Victim Protection Act.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 16 August 2006, the Court found Constant guilty of torture, crimes against humanity and the systematic use of violence against women (including rape in 2006).
    sentencing
    Appeals chamber verdict
    Constant appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. On December 1, 2009, the Second Circuit rejected Constant’s appeal and upheld the $19 million judgment against him. Constant filed a petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc by the full Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which was denied on February 23, 2010. Finally, on October 4, 2010 the U.S. Supreme Court issued an order denying Constant’s petition for a writ of certiorari.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    08-4827-cv
    Reparations / awards
    <span style="text-align: justify; line-height: 13.8px;">Constant was ordered to pay $19 million in compensatory and punitive damages to three women who survived the crimes committed under his control.</span>

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).